Ah, Zola.
I’ve read four books by Émile Zola in my life. All have at some point made me angry, upset or depressed for days. All have been sublime.
I do worry though that is in part due to the fact I have so far stuck to his ‘greatest hits’ books, the ones that every classics publisher has an edition of, the ones that are always on every bookshop shelf. I wonder how honest I am when I say, ‘I love Zola’ when really, I only know his best works and haven’t read one of them in years. (I did try a re-read of one of them last year but picked a bad translation and abandoned it.)
Most of his novels are part of Les Rougon-Macquart, a twenty novel cycle tracking families and their friends, lovers and community across almost twenty years and technically all the novels stand alone. You can dip in and out and choose any book that strikes your fancy. I’ve read three of the cycle but I’ve always wondered whether by reading books 7, 9 and 13 of this bigger narrative I have perhaps missed something…
O at Délaissé and Fanda at Fanda Classiclit are hosting a month long jamboree of Zola called Zoladdiction for the month of April so it seems like a good time to consider the question more seriously.
As regular readers know I never commit to solely reading one author or theme for a whole month but I reckon I can commit to reading the first two, possibly three, books of the series in April. I’ve never read any of the first three books and know very little about them (I am resisting the urge to google them to within a inch of their pages), so it feels a little bit like an adventure. I don’t know whether to expect writing that is a bit more uneven, am looking forward to seeing places and people I might know from later books and I can see there’s going to be the fun of deciding which translations fit me best as a reader. I love this kind of reading journey and I’m getting a bookgeeky thrill at the idea of starting again, properly, from Book 1.
Perhaps I’m a little OCD but I really do think I’ll get more out of the Zola experience this time round. :)
—
On a side note: I was planning on starting Les Misérables next week as my thinking was Swann’s Way followed by Les Misérables wasn’t too overwhelming as a pairing but Proust, Hugo and then Zola all within the space of three months is probably too rich a diet for me as a reader. It’d also be a bit overwhelming for any regular readers who like my usual eclectic mix of subjects and themes. So, to keep such good things in moderation, I am going to bump Hugo’s masterpiece of redemption, rioting and sightseeing in the Parisian sewers to later in the year.

February 27, 2013 at 00:57
I would say that yes, you are missing out if you don’t read the lot. Some of the 20 are the best books I’ve ever read; others are good and a couple are just ok. I was amazed at how good THE KILL is (just to mention one of the less-famous titles) and I’d never come across the title on any list of must-read books. It took me about 3 years to read the lot, but I didn’t want to rush it.
February 27, 2013 at 09:56
The Kill is the second book and is the one I knew of, meant to read but hadn’t so I am glad to hear you enjoyed it so much Guy. I’m thinking five or six a year sounds about right for me after starting the series from scratch so yes, about 3 years. That would have seemed such a big commitment at one point but now it just feels like an enjoyable journey, how perspective changes!
February 28, 2013 at 04:27
Oh you guys make me want to read more and more Zola. I’ve planned to read all of the 20, but you know…there are also other good books out there, that sometimes it’s difficult to be focus on one author only. But I wish to complete the 20 books by the end of my The Classics Club project! (and that’s why I host this event ;) )
February 27, 2013 at 03:50
Now here is a difference in sensibility. The two Zola novels I read mostly make me laugh. I think I am going to go for The Belly of Paris this time. Maybe thinking about the destruction of Les Halles will make me upset.
February 27, 2013 at 10:08
Interesting. I remember laughing at L’Assommoir but not the others, this is part of the reason I want to read the whole arc over a couple of years or so – I am sure I have missed elements of his style and skill by only reading a few so far. Belly of Paris is the third book so I might just make it to that in April and be able to compare notes with you. ;)
February 27, 2013 at 21:14
I read several Zola novels when in my early twenties. I remember really loving Germinal – and have meant to re-read it ever since. I think that Zola rather depressed me too however on the whole.
March 4, 2013 at 20:55
I’ll second, back up, emphasize Guy’s recommendation : THE KILL is fabulous. He loved it, I read it with friends and we loved it too.
March 4, 2013 at 20:56
Oh excellent, I can’t wait to get to it next month. :)
Pingback: Zoladdiction: a Zola Reading Event in April | Several, Four, Many
March 21, 2013 at 03:36
In preparation for Zoladdiction, I’ve tried to arrange the Rougon-Macquart series in a good chronological sequence to help readers get a better idea where their book sits in the sequence.
http://severalfourmany.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/zoladdiction-a-zola-reading-event-in-april/
It’s been years since I read Germinal, the most popular and possibly the best book of the series, but thinking about starting at the beginning with La Fortune des Rougon.
Looking forward to an enjoyable month of Zola!
Pingback: The grand structure of Rougon-Macquart | Several, Four, Many